Legal Opinion

Emery v. State

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1984No. TC 9072; CA A25025; SC S30042PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*757CAMPBELL, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action in Lake County to collect damages for the cost of repairs to their pickup truck. The issue of liability was submitted to the trial court on stipulated facts and cross motions for summary judgment. The trial court found for the plaintiffs and entered a judgment for damages in the amount of $2,000. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We reverse and remand.

The basic issue is framed by the parties’ stipulation:

“This case presents an issue of law, which is whether or not the State of Oregon is obligated to pay just compensation to the owners of private…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Hurtado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. President of the Monongahela Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. ReadyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. In re Special March 1981 Grand JuryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Bord v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Eggleston v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Eggleston v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API