Legal Opinion
MOELLER ET UX v. Multnomah County
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1959PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
(Pro Tempore)
This is an action for damages brought by George H. Moeller and Bernice E. Moeller, husband and wife, against Multnomah County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, for damages to their property by blasting operations conducted by the county at their rock quarry at Rocky Butte. The action is under the theory that there was a “taking” of their property by the county by inverse condemnation.
Prom a jury verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $2,500, the defendant county appeals to this court.
The principal question for determination in this case…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Peabody v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Tomasek v. Oregon State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Morrison v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Gearin v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Hawkins v. City of La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Lincoln Loan Co. v. State, State Highway Com'nOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. Fejes v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Dunn v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.