Warner/Elektra/Atlantic Corp. v. County of DuPage
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
*786MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROVNER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is the motion of defendant County of DuPage (“Du-Page”) for a directed verdict. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion.
II. ANALYSIS
Because this is a diversity case, the Court must look to Illinois law for guidance on the defendant’s motion for directed verdict. See Consolidated Bearings Co. v. Ehret-Krohn Corp., 913 F.2d 1224, 1227 (7th Cir.1990). The Illinois standard for such verdicts is set forth in Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern R.R. Co., 37 Ill.2d 494, 510, 229 N.E.2d 504, 513-14…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- United States v. Juan Montoya, Augustine Gomez, and Augustine RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Consolidated Bearings Co. v. Ehret-Krohn Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Horrell v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- City of Freeport v. IsbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1992
- Shade v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Warner/Elektra/Atlantic Corp. v. County of DuPageDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991