Legal Opinion

Shade v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 2002No. WD 58652PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.

Appellants 2 appeal from the trial court’s grant of the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission’s motion for summary judgment on Appellants’ petition for damages resulting from flooding on Appellants’ property. Appellants raise three points on appeal. First, Appellants contend that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the Commission because the court erroneously held that the statute of limitations that applies to a cause of action for inverse condemnation is five years pursuant to § 516.120, 3 and rather should have applied a statute…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. Barker v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1937

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Illig v. Union Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Cook v. DeSoto Fuels, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Thomas v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. George Ward Builders, Inc. v. City of Lee's SummitMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Wyper v. Camden CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API