Legal Opinion
Bowden v. DAVIS
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1955PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.
This is an appeal by defendants Oscar Davis and Buck Parmele from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Walter Bowden in an action to replevin 17 head of branded horses, 2 unbranded colts, and 2 branded mules, alleged to be of the reasonable value of $2,625.
The complaint, filed February 28, 1952, contains *423the usual allegations of ownership and right to immediate possession of the animals in question,, particularly describing them, and also the wrongful and unlawful taking of possession thereof by defendants, and the withholding possession from plaintiff “under claim that the animals were running…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- North American Cold Storage Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Omaechevarria v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Lawton v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- City of Houston v. LurieTexas Supreme Court · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Hugh C. Porter v. Susan Diblasio, Dane County Humane Society, Paul W. Humphrey, and Dane CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- In re the Marriage of PullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Walker v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Stanko v. MaharCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.