Legal Opinion

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Gallagher

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 30, 1939No. 213PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed

This case involves the same questions as Southern Pacific Co. v. Gallagher, ante, p. 167. The appellant sought to restrain the State Board of Equalization of the Stáfe¡i;fíf California, its members, and the Attorney General of the state from enforcing the Use Tax of 1935. A three-judge court granted an interlocutory injunction. Later, it denied a permanent injunction and dismissed the appellant’s bill 1 for the reasons stated in Southern Pacific Co. v. Corbett, 23 F. Supp. 193.

The appellant, a California corporation, operates a telephone and telegraph system in interstate and intrastate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Pac. Co. v. CorbettDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1938
  2. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. CorbettDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1938

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Federal Express Corp. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Union Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Lane Construction Corp. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API