Legal Opinion

Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc. v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1939No. Sac. 5205; Sac. 5208; Sac. 5209, 5210, 5211, 5212, 5213, 5214PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The three named plaintiffs noticed these appeals from judgments entered by the court below following the sustaining of demurrers to their respective complaints. By stipulation the appeals have been consolidated.

The actions were instituted under section 29 of the Use Tax Act of 1935 (Stats. 1935, chap. 361, p. 1297) by plaintiffs to recover taxes paid by them under that statute. No question is raised regarding the compliance by plaintiffs with the procedural requirements of the act dealing with the recovery of taxes paid under protest. The only issues involved relate to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Fox Bakersfield Theatre Corp. v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Kirkwood v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Union Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API