Legal Opinion
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Johnson
California Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1941No. Sac. 5416PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
—
-The controversy presented by this appeal involves the liability of plaintiff for the payment of the use tax levied under the California Use Tax Act of 1935. (Stats. 1935, p. 1297; Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act No. 8495a.) Plaintiff paid the tax under protest and then obtained judgment in the court below for the refund thereof; the defendant, Treasurer of the State of California, prosecutes this appeal from that judgment.
Plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Illinois with its principal offices in Chicago, Illinois. It has qualified to do business in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- General Oil Co. v. CrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Woodruff v. ParhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. ReilySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- International Business MacHines Corporation v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. BannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Union Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.