Southern Pac. Co. v. Corbett
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This case has been submitted under an agreed statement of facts which sustains the pertinent allegations of the bill discussed in our opinion denying* the motion for its dismissal. 20 F.Supp. 940. The railway has established that-the storage use of the railway materials, solely for its current repairs and renewals and necessary extensions of its intermingled interstate and intrastate enterprise and plant, and without which usage the railway would stop running, is a use in interstate commerce. Hence a tax upon such use is a tax affecting an interstate commerce use—that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Southern Pac. Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. CorbettDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1938
- Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939