Legal Opinion

Federal Express Corp. v. Skelton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 26, 1979No. 78-79 & 78-83PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marion S. Gill, Special Justice.

This case is a sequel to Skelton v. Federal Express Corporation, 259 Ark. 127, 531 S.W. 2d 941 (1976). Reference is made to that decision for the relevant facts concerning Federal Express Corporation. Following the decision of this Court in the foregoing case, but before the mandate was filed with the Pulaski Chancery Clerk, on February 16, 1976, the Governor signed into law Act 1237 of 1975, Extended Session, the provisions of which constitute the subject matter of this controversy. By said Act the Arkansas Compensating Tax Act, Ark. Stats. 84-3105(a) was…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hodges v. DawdySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Fulton Foundation v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Richardson v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  5. City of Louisville v. Louisville Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Roth v. YackleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re Marriage of CohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Burning Tree Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Body-Rite Repair Co. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API