Legal Opinion

Union Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization

California Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1963No. Sac. 7356PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

In this controversy as to the application of the California use tax to an extra-state sale and leaseback of two tankers we hold that an owner of property “uses” it under the tax statute when he leases it. The use of the lessor through the lease in California is a California use. The trial court’s finding that the purchaser at the date of the transaction anticipated that the lessee would use the vessels in California, and the subsequent actual use in California, render the transaction a purchase for use in this state. Hence the purchaser is liable for the tax upon the basis of the purchase…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wallace Berrie & Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Transamerica Leasing Corp. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API