Legal Opinion
City of Healdton v. Blackburn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 23, 1934No. 22412PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
In 1927, the electors of the city of Healdton voted a bond issue in the sum of $65,000, for the purpose of constructing and completing a waterworks system for the city. No question is raised as to the legality of this bond issue. After advertising for bids as required by law, the city entered into a written contract with the plaintiff to drill wells to provide water for the city and to furnish and install the necessary machinery and equipment, including a Diesel engine of not less than 120 IT. P., to be used in the operation of said water system. All to be done in accordance with the plans…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Buxton Skinner Stationery v. Bd. of Com'rs of CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Oklahoma City v. DerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- School Dist. No. 8, Marshall Co. v. Home Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Elsea Bros. v. KillianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Valley Vista Development Corp. v. City of Broken ArrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- City of Tulsa v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- City of Enid v. ReeserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- San Miguel v. Municipio de CaguasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
- Potts v. Biggs & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.