School Dist. No. 8, Marshall Co. v. Home Lumber Co.

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

Defendant pre^ sents its case in this court under three propositions. The first proposition stated in its brief reads as follows:

“The court erred in refusing to instruct the jury in substance that it was necessary for the" plaintiff to have presented to the defendant school board prior to the institution of this suit a verified claim under oath showing the separate items and the nature of each item for which it claimed an indebtedness owing to if.”

The mere statement of this proposition would seem to refute its merit, but defendant insists that this • is the proper…