Legal Opinion
Hastie v. Henderson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 20, 2000No. Civil Action 94-1437 SSHPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Counts I and II of plaintiffs second amended complaint, plaintiffs opposition, and defendant’s reply thereto. 1 Upon careful consideration of the entire record, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted. “Findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under Rule 12 or 56.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); Summers v. Department of Justice, 140 F.3d 1077, 1079-80 (D.C.Cir.1998). Nonetheless, the Court sets forth its reasoning.
Background
Plaintiff, Jimmie L.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- McFarland v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Mokhtar v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Marshall v. JamesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Globalaw Ltd. v. Carmon & Carmon Law OfficeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.