Legal Opinion
Marshall v. James
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 31, 2003No. Civil Action 98-1742 (AK)PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) [52], Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant Bruce James’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Opposition”) [53], and Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Reply”) [55]. A hearing was held on this Motion on April 29, 2003. Upon consideration of the Motion, Opposition, and Reply, and the parties’ oral arguments, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court has determined that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [52]…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Romero-Ostolaza v. RidgeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Carroll v. EnglandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Smith v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Pollard v. Quest DiagnosticsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Velikonja v. MuellerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.