Legal Opinion

United States v. Edwards

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided January 26, 1999No. Crim.A. 98-165-B-M2PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO RECUSE

POLOZOLA, Chief Judge.

All defendants except Gregory Tarver have filed motions to recuse Chief Judge Frank J. Polozola and all of the other judges in the Middle District of Louisiana for various reasons. In a short memorandum ruling, the court denied the motions to recuse Judge Polozola and found the motions to recuse the other judges of the Middle District moot. 1 The court now assigns its reasons for denying the motions to recuse. 2

I. BACKGROUND

Two separate motions to recuse Judge Polozola were filed in this case. In one motion, Edwin W. Edwards, Stephen…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Adair v. State, Dept. of Educ.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Adkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  3. State Ex Rel. Kaufman v. ZakaibWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. United States v. RoebuckDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2003
  5. United States v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API