Legal Opinion
Adair v. State, Dept. of Educ.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 2006No. 129467PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
709 N.W.2d 567 (2006)
474 Mich. 1027
Daniel ADAIR, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
STATE of Michigan, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Department of Management and Budget, and Treasurer of the State of Michigan, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 129467.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
January 31, 2006.
TAYLOR, C.J., and MARKMAN, J. state as follows:
Plaintiffs have moved for our recusal from participation in this case on the basis of our spouses' employment with the office of the Attorney General and the "appearance of impropriety" assertedly raised by such employment.[1]
Having carefully considered this motion, we deny…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bush v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense v. Arlo TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bradwell v. StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- James Freeman v. Pittsburgh Glass Works LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- State v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. v. FiegerMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. DuartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.