Legal Opinion
United States v. Roebuck
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided July 15, 2003No. CR.2002/0171PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO QUASH SUBPOENAS
BROTMAN, District Judge (sitting by designation).
This matter comes before the Court on the Government’s motion to quash subpoenas to compel the testimony of four federal court judges at an evidentiary hearing to recuse Judge Moore from presiding over this criminal case. The Government also seeks a protective order to prevent the service of further subpoenas seeking similar information. It is Defendant’s contention that the judges’ testimony is necessary to create a factual record in support of his Motion to Recuse.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Margarita Selkridge v. United of Omaha Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Adkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
- United States v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- In re C.M. & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Ciarlone v. City of ReadingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.