Legal Opinion
Broadmoor San Clemente Homeowners Assn. v. Nelson
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 23, 1994No. G013975PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, J. *
In 1974, the developer of the Broadmoor homes recorded a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) which provided “no business or commercial activity shall be maintained or conducted upon any of the [Broadmoor homes].’’ In 1990, appellants Robert N. Nelson, individually and as trustee of the Robert N. Nelson and Elsie M. Nelson Revocable Living Trust, Alexis Edwards, and Rosehaven, a corporation (the Nelsons), purchased a home subject to the CC&Rs. Subsequently the Nelsons remodeled the home to make it suitable for use as a licensed “residential care…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marbrunak, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. City of Stow, Ohio, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Welsch v. GoswickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- People's Home Savings Bank v. SadlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- United States v. ScottDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Casa Marie, Inc. v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico for the District of AreciboDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Harris v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- United States v. WagnerDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1996
- Konig v. Fair Employment and Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Barrett v. DawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- MacOm Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AGCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.