Legal Opinion
Welsch v. Goswick
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1982No. Docket Nos. 24797, 26331PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
Petitioners Betty and Joseph Goswick seek a writ of prohibition or certiorari related to their appeal (4 Civ. No. 24797) from a trial court order which finds them in violation, but not in contempt, of a stipulated injunctive judgment, orders them to cease and desist operating a residential care facility for six elderly persons, and awards $4,000 in attorney fees to counsel for real party/respondent Susan Fleet *401Welsch. They contend extraordinary relief is necessary because the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in making the order, and the order may be wholly or partly not…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Broughton v. Cigna HealthplansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Hollister v. Monterey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Hill v. Community of Damien of MolokaiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.