Barrett v. Dawson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
— In 1981 the California Legislature enacted a law which declared that restrictive covenants made after the effective date of the law (January 1, 1982), which limited family daycare homes in residential neighborhoods, were void. Then, in 1983, the Legislature amended the law to delete the reference to covenants made after its effective date. Covenants restricting family daycare homes were now “void,” period.
This case involves a restrictive covenant made prior to 1981 prohibiting a residence in Tustin from being used for any “business” activity, including a family daycare…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Fourth La Costa Condominium Owners Ass'n v. SeithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Villa Milano Homeowners Ass'n v. Il DavorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Treo @ Kettner Homeowners Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.