Legal Opinion

Konig v. Fair Employment and Housing Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2002No. S087843PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In Walnut Creek Manor v. Fair Employment & Housing Com. (1991) 54 Cal.3d 245, 267 [284 Cal.Rptr. 718, 814 P.2d 704] (Walnut Creek Manor), we held that the Fair Employment and Housing Commission’s (Commission) award of emotional distress damages to a housing discrimination complainant violated the California Constitution’s judicial powers clause (Cal. Const., art. VI, § l).1 In this case, we decide whether Walnut Creek Manor prohibits such an award under these facts, and whether subsequent amendments to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code,2 § 12900…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. West v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Kaufman v. ACS Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Auburn Woods I Homeowners Ass'n v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Larson v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Northrop Grumman Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API