Legal Opinion

Marbrunak, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. City of Stow, Ohio, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1992No. 91-3806, 91-3849PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.

Defendant, City of Stow, appeals from the district court’s order granting the permanent injunction requested by plaintiff, Marbrunak, Inc., enjoining the city from enforcing a zoning ordinance imposing special safety requirements on a residence plaintiff sought to operate for four mentally retarded adult women. The injunction resulted from the court’s conclusion that the city had violated the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (“FHAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. The case was submitted to the court upon stipulated facts. Plaintiff cross-appeals the refusal of the…

2Cited by38 opinions

  1. Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service, Incorporated v. BabinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Brad Bangerter v. Orem City Corporation, a Utah Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Tsombanidis v. West Haven Fire DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Smith & Lee Associates, Inc., A/K/A Mortenview Manor, a Michigan Corporation United States of America v. City of Taylor, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Village of Palatine, Illinois, Matthew Klein, Dick KozdrasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API