Legal Opinion

United States v. Scott

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 24, 1992No. Civ. A. 90-1374-TPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND, ORDER

THÉIS, District Judge.

The United States, on behalf of sellers of a residential property, brings this action against the various defendants for violations of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq. The defendants move to dismiss, contending that the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) failed to meet the time requirements imposed by 42 U.S.C. § 3610(g). (Doc. 38). The United States responds with a motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. (Doc. 54).

UNCONTROVERTED FACTS

The United States filed this action…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service, Incorporated v. BabinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. San Pedro Hotel Co., Inc., a California Corporation John Fentis, as Trustee for the Fentis Family Marital Trust B John M. Fentis, an Individual Pearle Fentis, an Individual Maria C. Fentis, an Individual John Fentis, as Trustee for the Fentis Family Survivor's Trust v. City of Los Angeles, a California Municipal Corporation Rudy Svorinich, Jr., an Individual, San Pedro Hotel Co., Inc., a California Corporation John Fentis, as Trustee for the Fentis Family Marital Trust B as Trustee for the Fentis Family Survivor's Trust, and as an Individual: Pearle Fentis Maria C. Fentis v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. San Pedro Hotel Co. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Hill v. Community of Damien of MolokaiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Deep East Texas Regional Mental Health & Mental Retardation Services v. Kinnear, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API