Legal Opinion

State v. Smoot

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 14, 1989No. B68-696; CA A47755PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, a switchblade knife, in his trouser pocket. ORS 166.240. He argues that ORS 166.240(1) is unconstitutional, because it violates Article I, section 27, of the Oregon Constitution. 1 We affirm.

ORS 166.240(1) provides, in relevant part:

“[A]ny person who carries concealed upon the person any knife having a blade that projects or swings into position by force of a spring or by centrifugal force and commonly known as a switchblade knife * * * commits a Class B misdemeanor.”

Defendant argues that the statute is unconstitutional,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. BlockerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. DelgadoOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. McIntyre v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  2. State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Hilly v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  4. State v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API