Legal Opinion
State v. Smoot
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 14, 1989No. B68-696; CA A47755PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Defendant appeals from a conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, a switchblade knife, in his trouser pocket. ORS 166.240. He argues that ORS 166.240(1) is unconstitutional, because it violates Article I, section 27, of the Oregon Constitution. 1 We affirm.
ORS 166.240(1) provides, in relevant part:
“[A]ny person who carries concealed upon the person any knife having a blade that projects or swings into position by force of a spring or by centrifugal force and commonly known as a switchblade knife * * * commits a Class B misdemeanor.”
Defendant argues that the statute is unconstitutional,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. BlockerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. DelgadoOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- McIntyre v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Hilly v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- State v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995