Legal Opinion

Hilly v. City of Portland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 29, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff James Hilly appeals from the entry by the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Alexander, J.) of summary judgment in favor of the City of Portland declaring that the concealed firearms statute, 25 M.R.S.A. §§ 2001-2006 (1988 & Supp. 1989), is constitutional. He also appeals the affirmance in Superior Court (Fritzsche, J.) of the City’s denial of his application for a permit to carry a concealed firearm. We find no merit in any of Hilly’s contentions on appeal.

25 M.R.S.A. § 2003 sets forth in detail the requirements for obtaining a concealed firearms permit.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matthews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Driscoll v. GheewallaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. Carson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Berry v. DaigleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  5. National Hearing Aid Centers, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MendozaHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. Max MischSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  3. State v. Max MischSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  4. State v. MendozaHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API