Legal Opinion

State v. Delgado

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1984No. TC CR83-946, CA A30962, SC S31059PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

The issue is whether ORS 166.510(1), insofar as it prohibits the mere possession and mere carrying of a switchblade knife, violates defendant’s right to bear arms under Article I, section 27, of the Oregon Constitution. We hold that in that respect the statute does violate defendant’s constitutional right.

ORS 166.510(1) provides, in relevant part:

«* * * [A]ny person who manufactures, causes to be manufactured, sells, keeps for sale, offers, gives, loans, carries or possesses an instrument or weapon having a blade which projects or swings into position by force of a spring or other device and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. BlockerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. City of Seattle v. MontanaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. City of Seattle v. MontanaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. George Young, Jr. v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API