Legal Opinion

State v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1995No. 93-40409; CA A83201PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Defendant was cited for casting light from a motor vehicle while armed, in violation of ORS 166.663. He demurred to the charge on the grounds that ORS 166.663 was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. After a hearing, the trial court granted the demurrer based on its conclusion that the statute was overbroad. The state appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in concluding that ORS 166.663 unconstitutionally infringed on defendant’s right to bear arms. Or Const, Art I, § 27. We reverse.

An overbroad statute is one that is so broad that it “reaches conduct which may not be prohibited.”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. BlockerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Wasco County Ambulance Service, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API