State v. Kessler
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.
The defendant in this case was convicted of "possession of a slugging weapon,” ORS 166.510(1). We allowed review to consider his claim that the legislative prohibition of the possession of a "billy” 2 in ORS 166.510(1) violates Article I, section 27, of the Oregon Constitution. That provision states:
"The people shall have the right to bear arms for the defence [sic] of themselves, and the State, but the Military shall be kept in strict subordination to the civil power.”
The language of this provision raises several questions in this case, including:(a) To whom does the right belong?(b) What is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Presser v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Matthews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.