Legal Opinion

Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Naslund

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1932No. Docket No. 764PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment of the trial court, sitting without a jury, in a suit to foreclose a materialman’s lien on certain real property.

The principal question presented by this appeal is the matter of priority between a certain materialman’s lien and a certain deed of trust.

In the complaint, which is in the ordinary form for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien, defendant Sam Naslund is sued as the owner of the premises and the purchaser of the building materials furnished by appellant. The trial court found, in substance, that, at all times…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McClain v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. W. P. Fuller & Co. v. McClureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Witty v. ClinchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. HelgesenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Fickling v. JackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Wilson v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Lumber & Builders Supply Co. v. RitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Mann v. LeaskoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. CorbettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API