Fickling v. Jackman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Abraham Schneider in his lifetime, as owner, made a contract with W. T. Jackman Company, one of the defendants, as builder, for the construction of a fifteen-unit bungalow court on Cahuenga Avenue in the city of Los Angeles. The Jackman Company agreed to furnish all labor and material necessary for the erection and completion of the units. The contract price was stipulated to be $43,840, payable in amounts equal to seventy per cent of paid bills as the work progressed, and a sum in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Tapia v. DemartiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- W. P. Fuller & Co. v. McClureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Callan v. Empire State Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Smith v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Pacific States Electric Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Pacific Trust Co. TTEE v. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Hollerman Mfg. Co. v. Standard Accident InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.