Legal Opinion

Witty v. Clinch

California Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 10021PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The defendant Anna M. Parsons was on the twenty-first day of April, 1924, the owner of lot 61 of Hollywood Heights Tract in the county of Los Angeles. On or about said date she conveyed said lot to defendant Nan K. Clinch, wife of defendant Colin N. Clinch. It was agreed by said parties at the time of said conveyance that the purchase price of said lot was to be the sum of $3,000 and that in payment thereof Colin N. Clinch and wife should execute to Anna M. Parsons four promissory notes for $750 each, secured by a trust deed to said lot. It was further agreed that Clinch and wife should…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jordan v. GroverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Briggs v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Kopperud v. CooksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Schoen v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Burns v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Reasor Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Berger v. SteinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Howell v. DowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Stueve Bros. Farms v. Berger KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Rabbit v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API