W. P. Fuller & Co. v. McClure
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior C.ourt of Los Angeles County. John W. Shenk, Judge. Modified and affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
The defendant and cross-complainant, John Q. McClure, the holder of a mortgage, appeals from a decree of foreclosure given in several actions for the foreclosure of mechanics’ liens. The actions were consolidated and tried as one action. The sole question is one of priority as between appellant, the holder of the mortgage, the defendant Young, who is the beneficiary under a trust deed, and the mechanics’ lien claimants.
The ease comes to us on a bill of exceptions. The bill contains no specification of the “particulars” wherein the evidence is claimed to be insufficient. [1] By a long line of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Shirras & Others v. Caig & MitchelSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Freeman v. . AuldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Tapia v. DemartiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Smith v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Fickling v. JackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Superior Lumber Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Central Savings Bank v. CoulterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Coast Central Credit Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.