Dingeman Advertising, Inc. v. Algoma Township
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Kavanagh, C. J.
(separate opinion). This case is before us on leave granted from the decision of the Court of Appeals, 46 Mich App 71; 207 NW2d 488 (1973) reversing an order of the trial court which permanently enjoined the defendant township from interfering with appellant’s vested billboard use. As we find that such a vested right by way of an existing nonconforming use did exist, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
This case comes before us upon stipulated facts which are crucial to its determination. The follow*95ing calendar of events adequately sets forth the factual situation:
April, 1970…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Lansing v. DawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Sandenburgh v. Michigamme Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Detroit Edison Co. v. City of WixomMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Fredal v. ForsterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Paterek v. Village of Armada, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Bevan v. Brandon TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Heath Township v. SallMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Dorr v. City of EcorseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Adams Outdoor Advertising v. East LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.