Adams Outdoor Advertising v. East Lansing
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
In the instant case, we granted leave to appeal to consider the single issue whether the City of East Lansing has the statutory authority to enact and enforce its sign ordinance that eliminates nonconforming billboards and signs over a *212reasonable period of time.1 The trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary disposition, reasoning that the city did not have the statutory authority to eliminate existing signs without compensating sign owners. The Court of Appeals affirmed.2
On appeal, the city argues that MCL 117.4i(5); MSA 5.2082(5) gives it the statutory authority to forcibly…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Grant v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Altman v. Meridian TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Rental Property Owners Ass'n v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Adams Outdoor Advertising v. City of East LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Adams Outdoor Advertising, Inc v. City of HollandMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. RogersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.