Legal Opinion
Fredal v. Forster
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided December 8, 1967No. Docket 1,261, 1,494PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Ii. Gnus, J.
Plaintiffs brought an action to permanently enjoin and restrain the operation of a gravel pit and the use of defendants’ land for quarrying purposes.
The plaintiffs are 20 neighboring property owners 1 and the township in which the qnarry land is located. Operation of the property as a quarry site was permanently enjoined by judgment of the trial court and defendants appeal from that order.
A second case arising out of the same proceedings is consolidated on this appeal. The basis of that appeal is the combination counterclaim and cross-claim filed in the trial court by defendants, Forster,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- City of Lansing v. DawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Brown v. BuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Adams v. Kalamazoo Ice & Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Pereira v. Farace - concurrenceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- City of University Place v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- City of University Place v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Barton Contracting Co., Inc. v. City of AftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.