Legal Opinion

Bevan v. Brandon Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1991No. Docket 86358; Calendar 2PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

We must decide whether enforcement of a township ordinance which restricts the use of plaintiffs’ land amounts in this case to an unconstitutional "taking” without just compensation. Plaintiffs own approximately six acres of undeveloped land which does not front on a public road. Their predecessor in title had divided the parcel into two contiguous lots, each with its own tax description, and the lots were sold separately to plaintiffs. The only access to plaintiffs’ property is an easement 20 feet wide and 290 feet long across a neighbor’s land. Under township land-use ordinances adopted…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Seguin v. City Of Sterling HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  3. K & K Const. v. DnrMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. K & K Construction, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Frericks v. Highland TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API