Legal Opinion
Cucamonga County Water District v. Southwest Water Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 1971No. Civ. 10026PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GABBERT, J.
Appellant (plaintiff below) is the Cucamonga County Water District, a public entity formed under the County Water District Law. Respondents are the Southwest Water Company, a privately owned public utility water company, and Rochester Water Company, a mutual water company.
In 1957 Southwest received a certificate of public convenience and necessity to provide water service in the lightly populated Etiwanda area, located between the City of Fontana and the Cities of Upland and Ontario in western San Bernardino County. It lies in country sloping gently southward from the base…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Village Development Co. v. FiliceNevada Supreme Court · 1974
- Karuk Tribe of Northern California v. California Regional Water Quality Control Bd., North Coast RegionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cabral v. State Board of ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- United Pacific Insurance v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.