Legal Opinion
Karuk Tribe of Northern California v. California Regional Water Quality Control Bd., North Coast Region
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 2010No. A124351, A124369, A124370PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
These three appeals are the result of a rather unusual combination of administrative and judicial proceedings to determine whether state law regulating water quality can be applied to dams licensed by an agency of the federal government. A number of private parties asked the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (Board), to enforce California’s law governing waste discharge to several hydroelectric dam-reservoirs on the Klamath River. The Board—having twice attempted to assert state law on this very subject and having twice been decisively and…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Marin Ass'n of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch v. Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cates v. ChiangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Friends of Spring St. v. Nev. City, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.