Legal Opinion
Cabral v. State Board of Control
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 8, 1980No. Docket Nos. 56512, 57279PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COBEY, Acting P. J.
We have consolidated these two appeals on motion of their common defendant, the State Board of Control (hereafter *1014Board), since both present the same fundamental issue, i.e., the validity of a particular regulation of the Board (Cal. Admin. Code, tit. 2, § 649.12) defining the term “resident of California” as used in the Victims of Violent Crimes Act (hereafter Act). (Gov. Code, §§ 13959-13969.1.)1
The trial court in these two administrative mandamus proceedings concluded that this regulation was both illegal and in violation of the equal protection provisions of both…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Cooper v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Rzeszotarski v. RzeszotarskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Darces v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Local 512, Warehouse and Office Workers' Union, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Felbro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Caballero v. MartinezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Graham v. State Board of ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.