Legal Opinion

Jostens, Inc. v. Mission Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 12, 1986No. C8-84-692PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

May an insured, who defends itself, settle its claim for defense costs with its underlying insurer on a loan receipt agreement and then recover its defense costs from its umbrella carrier when, at the time the defense was tendered to both insurers, both arguably had primary coverage? The trial court held the umbrella carrier was solely liable for the insured’s defense costs, but the court of appeals, without reaching that issue, reversed, holding the insured was not the real party in interest. We reverse both the court of appeals and the trial court and remand for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. Reserve InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Nordby v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Ross v. Briggs and MorganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of PittsburghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API