Legal Opinion
Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 6, 1997No. C6-95-1285PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
This is an appeal from a determination in a declaratory judgment action that the Tower Insurance Company, Inc. (hereinafter “insurer”) had a duty to defend Meadowbrook, Inc., and its president and sole shareholder, S. Bruce Lansky (hereinafter “insured”), against a multi-claim lawsuit filed by four Meadowbrook employees in January 1991. The trial court entered four judgments total-ling $228,834.13 to cover the insured’s costs for both defending the underlying action and prosecuting the declaratory judgment action from March 26, 1992 until January 4, 1995. The…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Flomerfelt v. CardielloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- American Motorists Insurance v. L-C-A Sales Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Federal Insurance Company, & v. Tri-State Insurance Company, & Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.