Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
This case is part of Cargill, Inc.’s ongoing efforts to recover its expenses in defending itself and three of its subsidiaries in a patent infringement suit. We are asked to determine the nature and extent of three insurers’ duties to reimburse Car-gill for its defense costs. The patent infringement suit will be reviewed briefly, followed by Cargill’s insurance coverage at the time of the suit, and then the legal issues in the instant case will be presented.
Life Point Systems, Inc. (Life Point) owned proprietary rights to three patents in a spread spectrum radio…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Cincinnati Companies v. West American InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Unigard Insurance v. LevenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Blake v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Wozniak Travel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Talen v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.