Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ross v. Briggs and Morgan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 22, 1995No. C7-93-2568PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COYNE, Justice.

The plaintiff Scott M. Ross, M.D., commenced this legal malpractice action complaining that the Briggs and Morgan law firm was negligent in representing him in connection with his termination of employment with Manuel 0. Jaffe, M.D., and Skin Diseases, P.A., by reason of the firm’s failure to tender the defense of that termination litigation to St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ross’ commercial general liability insurer. Claiming that the policy required the insurer to defend and indemnify him for advertising injury liability, Ross alleged that he incurred…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Jostens, Inc. v. Mission Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Garvis v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Darby & Darby, P. C. v. VSI International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Transportation InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Piper Jaffray Companies, Inc. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  5. Callas Enterprises, Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API