Legal Opinion
Kim v. Magnotta
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 1, 1999No. SC 15995PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
This certified appeal raises issues that are at the crossroads of the remedial provisions of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA); General Statutes §§ 42-110b and 42-llOg;1 and the four month limitation period for opening judgments contained both in General Statutes § 52-212a and Practice Book § 17-4.2 The specific question is whether a trial court, having accepted a jury verdict that a stipulated judgment in a prior action between the parties resulted *97from a CUTPA violation, but not from fraud,3 has the authority to set the judgment aside after the expiration…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Viera v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Opoku v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Duplissie v. DevinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Cantoni v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.