Legal Opinion

First American Corp. v. Price Waterhouse LLP

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 23, 1998No. M8-85 RWSPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Price Waterhouse-United Kingdom (“PW-UK”) has moved pursuant to Rule 45(c)(2)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the reimbursement of costs in the amount of $210,990.67 incurred in obtaining the United Kingdom (“UK”) and Cayman court orders lifting the various foreign legal restrictions preventing production of documents responsive to the subpoena issued by this Court. First American Corporation (“FAC”) has. moved for a determination of the reasonableness of PW-UK’s redaction costs, which PW-UK incurred pursuant to an order issued by the Cayman court.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. First American Corp. v. Price Waterhouse LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  2. In re Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Georgia-Pacific LLC v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  4. United States v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
  5. Behrend v. Comcast Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API