Legal Opinion

In re Honeywell International, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 18, 2003No. M8-85 WHPPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PAULEY, District Judge.

Presently before this Court is plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of certain documents in a putative securities class action styled In re Honeywell International, Inc. Securities Litigation, 00 Civ. 3605(DRD), pending in the District of New Jersey. The defendants in that action include Honeywell International, Inc. (“Honeywell”) and several former directors of that company. The putative class of plaintiffs (“plaintiffs”) allege in the underlying action that defendants made materially false and misleading statements about Honeywell’s financial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Deloitte LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Yorkville Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. John B. v. GoetzDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
  4. Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. v. Nanometrics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
  5. In re Application Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 for an Order Permitting Christen Sveaas to Take Discovery from Dominique Levy, L & M Galleries & Other Non-Participants for Use in Actions Pending in the NorwayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API