Legal Opinion
Behrend v. Comcast Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 16, 2008No. Civ.A. No. 07-mc-10224-PBSPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL
JOYCE LONDON ALEXANDER, United States Magistrate Judge.
On December 8, 2003, Plaintiffs, (collectively, “Behrend”), cable subscribers of the *85Defendants, (collectively, “Comcast”), filed an antitrust class action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania alleging violations of Sections 1 (restraint of trade) and 2 (unlawful monopolization and attempted monopolization) of the Sherman Act. This Motion to Compel arises from non-party Greater Media, Inc.’s (“Greater Media”) efforts to withhold requested documents from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Microsoft Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- In re the Exxon ValdezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- In re Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Tutor-Saliba Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- First American Corp. v. Price Waterhouse LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 79 v. ScottDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. KonoverDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019
- Britton v. MARCUS, ERRICO, EMMER & BROOKS, P.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Cardionet, LLC v. InfoBionic, IncDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.