Legal Opinion
In Re: Sealed Case
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 14, 1998No. 98-5062PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.
Concurring Opinion filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
Respondent, defendant in a civil case pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, served a subpoena duces tecum on petitioner, a law firm, demanding production of documents and testimony at a deposition in Washington, D.C. That subpoena, in conformance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(a)(2), issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. When petitioner objected to the subpoena, respondent…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- In re Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Bank of ChinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Watts v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Republic of Venezuela v. Philip Morris IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.