Legal Opinion

In re Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 2005No. MDL No. 1426PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

SURRICK, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’1 Motion to Compel the European Council of the Paint, Printing Ink and Artists’ Colours Industry (“CEPE”) to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Request for Production of Documents and Memorandum in Support. (Doc. No. 143.) *484For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion ■ will be granted in part and denied in part.2

1. BACKGROUND

A. Underlying Action

In this antitrust class action, Plaintiffs allege that from January 1, 1993, to December 31, 2000 (the “Class Period”), various domestic and foreign manufacturers of automotive…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Georgia-Pacific LLC v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  3. Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. In re Diet Drugs (Phentermine/Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Highland Tank & Mfg. Co. v. PS International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API