In re Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
SURRICK, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’1 Motion to Compel the European Council of the Paint, Printing Ink and Artists’ Colours Industry (“CEPE”) to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Request for Production of Documents and Memorandum in Support. (Doc. No. 143.) *484For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion ■ will be granted in part and denied in part.2
1. BACKGROUND
A. Underlying Action
In this antitrust class action, Plaintiffs allege that from January 1, 1993, to December 31, 2000 (the “Class Period”), various domestic and foreign manufacturers of automotive…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Georgia-Pacific LLC v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- In re Diet Drugs (Phentermine/Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Highland Tank & Mfg. Co. v. PS International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.